good to have some input ! i do agree on the poit to have relevant informations on the batman wiki, but i don't feel a wiki is the right tool for interactive collaboration. It might be suitable more for nearly finished dokumentation.
Teamwork must have some "noise" which ist filtered out once "cooking" is done and dinner is ready. ;-) Meanwhile i have setup a testpage to show the organisation in my personal approach to manage the "information" mess once starting with batman-adv for the first time. Anybody might have a look at http://joker.eu5.org/ which represents ROUGHLY what i have in mind. It's done with Mindmanager and exported to html so for me it's very easy to reoganize the subjects whilst orking on it. Whatever tool we agree to use, its fine for me; giving a chance someone has time and have a look at Teamlab or similiar pse send me a personal msg to hand the access code for playing around. Let's find a way to organize the communication and start to gather the scattered informations on one place or the other regards 3zl 2012/4/28 Guido Iribarren <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Mitar <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> To keep things tidy, should we nest everything under >>> http://interop.wlan-si.net/wiki/WikiSquatters/ ? >>> ;) >> >> No need for that. Maybe just /wiki/Gudes/ or /wiki/Tutorials/? >> >> Anyway, I am not sure what is wrong with current Batman wiki? >> >> http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv > > Well, I first got the feeling that the batman-adv wiki was more > implementation-agnostic, but now that i come to think about it, that > wouldn't make much sense :P > > Then, let's fill in that gap in batman-adv wiki, and if things start > dealing with other routing protocols than batman, we can put that > stuff in interop wiki > > This is compatible with 3zl' proposal of using forum packages, since > AFAIU that's just a bigger framework where a wiki fits in. :) > >> On one side I am very for combining our efforts, but we should make sure >> that content is updated/actual/maintained and this is possible only if >> communities are behind it. So yes, we could start doing a common wiki >> for everything, too. :-) >> >> >> Mitar
