On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 04:38:58 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > Details > > On Tuesday 08 May 2012 22:31:57 Matthias Schiffer wrote: > > To ensure an entry isn't added twice all comparisons have to be protected > > by the hash line write spinlock. This doesn't really hurt as the case > > that it is tried to add an element already present to the hash shouldn't > > occur very often, so in most cases the lock would have have to be taken > > anyways. > > > > > >[..] > > > > -err_unlock: > > - rcu_read_unlock(); > > +unlock: > > + spin_unlock_bh(list_lock); > > > > out: > > return ret; > > } > > Acked-by: Sven Eckelmann <[email protected]>
Applied in revision 41c5874. Thanks, Marek
