The flag field of the tt_local_entry->common structure in tt_local_add()
is first assigned NO_FLAGS and then TT_CLIENT_NEW so nullifying the first
operation. For this reason it is safe to remove the first assignment.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]>
---
 translation-table.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/translation-table.c b/translation-table.c
index 517324a..0e18348 100644
--- a/translation-table.c
+++ b/translation-table.c
@@ -305,7 +305,11 @@ void batadv_tt_local_add(struct net_device *soft_iface, 
const uint8_t *addr,
                   (uint8_t)atomic_read(&bat_priv->tt.vn));
 
        memcpy(tt_local->common.addr, addr, ETH_ALEN);
-       tt_local->common.flags = BATADV_NO_FLAGS;
+       /* The local entry has to be marked as NEW to avoid to send it in
+        * a full table response going out before the next ttvn increment
+        * (consistency check)
+        */
+       tt_local->common.flags = BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW;
        if (batadv_is_wifi_iface(ifindex))
                tt_local->common.flags |= BATADV_TT_CLIENT_WIFI;
        atomic_set(&tt_local->common.refcount, 2);
@@ -316,12 +320,6 @@ void batadv_tt_local_add(struct net_device *soft_iface, 
const uint8_t *addr,
        if (batadv_compare_eth(addr, soft_iface->dev_addr))
                tt_local->common.flags |= BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE;
 
-       /* The local entry has to be marked as NEW to avoid to send it in
-        * a full table response going out before the next ttvn increment
-        * (consistency check)
-        */
-       tt_local->common.flags |= BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW;
-
        hash_added = batadv_hash_add(bat_priv->tt.local_hash, batadv_compare_tt,
                                     batadv_choose_orig, &tt_local->common,
                                     &tt_local->common.hash_entry);
-- 
1.7.12.4

Reply via email to