Thanks Gui for share your experiences. As soon as we can give formal results from our implementation in Huancavelica, (Peru) we'll share it too.
PD: it's nice the test of the roaming through the river ;-) 2012/11/16 Gui Iribarren <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Gioacchino Mazzurco <[email protected]> wrote: >> In Ninux Pisa we use batman-adv too with similar results! > > Great! I'm partially aware of it, but have no idea of the scale and > the details. Do share your experience! :D > > I also came accross this > > http://www.open-mesh.org/projects/open-mesh/wiki/New_papers > > some interesting readings > >> >> eccept for this: >> >> On 11/02/12 22:21, Gui Iribarren wrote: >>> As it is today, you can't put 2 ipv6 gateways doing SLAAC in the same >>> batman-adv cloud. >> >> This sentence is a little misleading, it is not true you cannot do it, >> you can but you just receive multiple route announcement that may be not >> optimal but it is not problematic in most cases > > IF they are announcing the same prefix, then i agree with your statement > But AFAIU it's currently not possible to have different gateways > announcing two different prefixes... Clients get SLAAC addresses on > two different networks, and things break, (at least that's what i > understand about how things should work?) > > If batman-adv could segregate RAs broadcast domains, it would separate > ipv6 networks much like it does now with dhcpv4 servers offering ips > on different subnets > > Gui -- Esteban
