On Friday 27 September 2013 10:13:51 Matthias Schiffer wrote: > No problem. Any idea for a good name for the new function? Currently, > the init functions are named a bit inconsistently, there is > batadv_iv_init, which is called in batadv_init, and many other > batadv_*_init called in batadv_mesh_init. I'd prefer renaming all those > to batadv_*_mesh_init, but that seems like lots of avoidable changes for > a net/stable patch. > > Maybe the maint patch could stay like it is, and I'll add another patch > on top for master that cleans things up?
Yes, you could come up with a naming convention you introduce with the maint patch for nc_init() / nc_free(). Other renamings could go into next or master. Cheers, Marek
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
