On Tuesday 10 June 2014 17:45:17 André Gaul wrote: > btw: do you have any pointers to documentation that can help me > understand why the kernel developers still use email as the primary > channel for submitting patches? Given the fact that git gracefully > handles the transmission of code, the handling of all code via email > appears archaic and too complicated to me. (no flame war intended, I > just want to learn about the reasons!) ;)
Traditionally, patches on the mailing list make it easy to review & comment patches by everyone. What is the alternative you have in mind (no vendor lock-in please) ? Cheers, Marek
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
