Hello Ray,
thanks a lot for your mail.
On Sunday 10 August 2014 15:00:51 Ray Gibson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are there any documented cases (aside from the aging graph on the
> wiki) on batman-adv bonding setups?
Not as far as I know. The bonding feature does not seem to be the most popular
one. :) (If there is anyone, please tell us!)
>
> I'm testing batman-adv 2014.3.0 in an effort to experiment and test
> with multi-link optimizations. There is no wifi in the picture at the
> moment, this is being done with tap interfaces right now.
>
> My two nodes have this network config:
> lan0: bridge of eth0 and bat0, 192.168.100.1 on node1, 192.168.100.2 on
> node2 bat0: includes tap0 and tap1 active, no IP.
> eth1: "wan" link, 10.10.10.1 on node1, 10.10.10.2 on node2
> tap0/1: openvpn bridge links over eth1, no IPs assigned to these interfaces.
>
> This is a VMware environment for testing. With the above setup, I can
> ping/iperf/whatever back and forth on the 192.168.100.x network. It
> works great just extending a lan transparently on a wan link. This
> was the original idea, with redundant connections (hence the multi tap
> interfaces).
>
> Now, I'm trying to isolate the test down to bonding. However,
> enabling bonding in batctl on both nodes has no apparent effect
> whatsoever. Watching an iperf session in ifstat, I will see constant
> traffic on bat0, and then either tap0 or tap1 depending on how it's
> feeling at the time. Sometimes it will shift all the traffic to the
> other tap interface. Sometimes the incoming traffic will be on one
> interface and the outgoing traffic will be on the other.
>
> Note: I'm running iperf/etc on the nodes themselves, not on separate
> devices on the lan bridge.
Hmm. What you should see after enabling bonding would be a similar usage of
both interfaces. I guess each tap interfaces of node1 is "directly connected"
to the other tap interface of node2, right? Could you please share your
outputs of:
batctl originators
batctl originators -i tap0
batctl originators -i tap1
>
> Ultimately I am looking to try bonding several 3G or 4G devices
> together with batman-adv to achieve higher throughput to a single
> destination.
Please note that the bonding will only benefit under some circumstances, as far
as my experiments have shown:
* since its round robin, you'll only see a benefit if the worst link does not
have less than 50% throughput of the best one - otherwise it will slow the
other links down.
* different latencies or buffering delays in the links may lead to out of
order
packets, and not every payload traffic likes that.
I could see some improvement when having two equal wifi links though. In any
case, please thoroughly test it before applying that to your 3g/4g
application, there may be some pitfalls. I'd be also very interested in your
findings. :)
Thanks,
Simon
