The tt_local_entry deletion performed batadv_tt_local_remove() was neither
protecting against simultaneous deletes nor checking whether the element
was still part of the list before calling hlist_del_rcu().

Replacing the hlist_del_rcu() with batadv_hash_remove() provides adequate
protection via hash spinlocks as well as a is-element-still-in-hash check.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner <[email protected]>
---
 translation-table.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/translation-table.c b/translation-table.c
index e95a424..4afeeb5 100644
--- a/translation-table.c
+++ b/translation-table.c
@@ -1042,7 +1042,8 @@ uint16_t batadv_tt_local_remove(struct batadv_priv 
*bat_priv,
         * immediately purge it
         */
        batadv_tt_local_event(bat_priv, tt_local_entry, BATADV_TT_CLIENT_DEL);
-       hlist_del_rcu(&tt_local_entry->common.hash_entry);
+       batadv_hash_remove(bat_priv->tt.local_hash, batadv_compare_tt,
+                          batadv_choose_tt, &tt_local_entry->common);
        batadv_tt_local_entry_free_ref(tt_local_entry);
 
        /* decrease the reference held for this vlan */
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to