On Monday 07 March 2016 15:21:07 Matthias Schiffer wrote: [...] > By the way, the netns support is another good reason to switch from the > debugfs interfaces to a netlink-based interface (as the netlink interface > wouldn't need userspace applications like batctl to be aware of the > namespaces). I guess I should finally finish the patches I started writing > for that...
So what is your suggestion here? Should the namespace support for namespaces
be rejected and you send in your netlink implementation patches? Or should
this patch be merged and be removed (together with the rest of the debugfs
stuff) when your netlink support is integrated?
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
