Removing duplicate code.

Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luess...@c0d3.blue>
---
Changes in RFC -> non-RFC:
 * Added kerneldoc
 * Added Signed-off-by

 net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c 
b/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c
index fa76465..66114af 100644
--- a/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c
+++ b/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c
@@ -948,6 +948,41 @@ static unsigned short batadv_dat_get_vid(struct sk_buff 
*skb, int *hdr_size)
 }
 
 /**
+ * batadv_dat_arp_create_reply - create an ARP Reply
+ * @bat_priv: the bat priv with all the soft interface information
+ * @ip_src: ARP sender IP
+ * @ip_dst: ARP target IP
+ * @hw_src: Ethernet source and ARP sender MAC
+ * @hw_dst: Ethernet destination and ARP target MAC
+ * @vid: VLAN identifier (optional, set to zero otherwise)
+ *
+ * Creates an ARP Reply from the given values, optionally encapsulated in a
+ * VLAN header.
+ *
+ * Return: An skb containing an ARP Reply.
+ */
+static struct sk_buff *
+batadv_dat_arp_create_reply(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, __be32 ip_src,
+                           __be32 ip_dst, u8 *hw_src, u8 *hw_dst,
+                           unsigned short vid)
+{
+       struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+       skb = arp_create(ARPOP_REPLY, ETH_P_ARP, ip_dst, bat_priv->soft_iface,
+                        ip_src, hw_dst, hw_src, hw_dst);
+       if (!skb)
+               return NULL;
+
+       if (vid & BATADV_VLAN_HAS_TAG)
+               skb = vlan_insert_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q),
+                                     vid & VLAN_VID_MASK);
+
+       skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
+
+       return skb;
+}
+
+/**
  * batadv_dat_snoop_outgoing_arp_request - snoop the ARP request and try to
  * answer using DAT
  * @bat_priv: the bat priv with all the soft interface information
@@ -1005,17 +1040,12 @@ bool batadv_dat_snoop_outgoing_arp_request(struct 
batadv_priv *bat_priv,
                        goto out;
                }
 
-               skb_new = arp_create(ARPOP_REPLY, ETH_P_ARP, ip_src,
-                                    bat_priv->soft_iface, ip_dst, hw_src,
-                                    dat_entry->mac_addr, hw_src);
+               skb_new = batadv_dat_arp_create_reply(bat_priv, ip_dst, ip_src,
+                                                     dat_entry->mac_addr,
+                                                     hw_src, vid);
                if (!skb_new)
                        goto out;
 
-               if (vid & BATADV_VLAN_HAS_TAG)
-                       skb_new = vlan_insert_tag(skb_new, htons(ETH_P_8021Q),
-                                                 vid & VLAN_VID_MASK);
-
-               skb_reset_mac_header(skb_new);
                skb_new->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb_new,
                                                   bat_priv->soft_iface);
                bat_priv->stats.rx_packets++;
@@ -1079,22 +1109,11 @@ bool batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_request(struct 
batadv_priv *bat_priv,
        if (!dat_entry)
                goto out;
 
-       skb_new = arp_create(ARPOP_REPLY, ETH_P_ARP, ip_src,
-                            bat_priv->soft_iface, ip_dst, hw_src,
-                            dat_entry->mac_addr, hw_src);
-
+       skb_new = batadv_dat_arp_create_reply(bat_priv, ip_dst, ip_src,
+                                             dat_entry->mac_addr, hw_src, vid);
        if (!skb_new)
                goto out;
 
-       /* the rest of the TX path assumes that the mac_header offset pointing
-        * to the inner Ethernet header has been set, therefore reset it now.
-        */
-       skb_reset_mac_header(skb_new);
-
-       if (vid & BATADV_VLAN_HAS_TAG)
-               skb_new = vlan_insert_tag(skb_new, htons(ETH_P_8021Q),
-                                         vid & VLAN_VID_MASK);
-
        /* To preserve backwards compatibility, the node has choose the outgoing
         * format based on the incoming request packet type. The assumption is
         * that a node not using the 4addr packet format doesn't support it.
-- 
2.1.4

Reply via email to