Hi, On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:48:23PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:56:25AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > It is therefore currently unknown how to continue from here. Antonio, > > please > > provide a statement what we should do with the patches. > > There were two issues here: > 1) the code was not really following the kernel style and I started my branch > to > "smoothen" it a little bit and possibly re-propose it to the mailing list; >
I pushed my ordex/bla_dat branch after rebasing it on top of current master. Patch 1 and 2 are ok for me. The doubts I had were about the rest, which is mostly about rearrangement of BLA. @Simon, I think here I'd need you to give a deep look to understand what could possibly go wrong in the cases described. These changes may violate some of the scenarios fixed by BLA.. Could you please have a look? Cheers, -- Antonio Quartulli
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
