The kernel documentation for batadv_send_skb_unicast() states that only the
return values NET_XMIT_DROP and NET_XMIT_SUCCESS are valid. Functions like
batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_request() are only checking if the return is
not NET_XMIT_DROP to check if send was successful or not. Negative values
were therefore also handled as success.

Similar functions are not returning the batadv_send_skb_to_orig() return
value directly but are checking if it is a direct success and only then
marking the return as such. This must also be adopted for
batadv_send_skb_unicast().

Fixes: 83fef820ecdb ("batman-adv: Consume skb in receive handlers")
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- fix NET_RX_SUCCESS-NET_XMIT_SUCCESS confusion in code (not actual
  behavior change)
- Link to v1: 
https://patch.msgid.link/20260729-ucast-send-restrict-return-v1-1-07cf6d2ec...@narfation.org
---
 net/batman-adv/send.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/batman-adv/send.c b/net/batman-adv/send.c
index 2122560c..929b6dd3 100644
--- a/net/batman-adv/send.c
+++ b/net/batman-adv/send.c
@@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ int batadv_send_skb_unicast(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
        struct batadv_unicast_packet *unicast_packet;
        int ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
        struct ethhdr *ethhdr;
+       int res;
 
        if (!orig_node)
                goto out;
@@ -360,7 +361,10 @@ int batadv_send_skb_unicast(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
        if (batadv_tt_global_client_is_roaming(bat_priv, ethhdr->h_dest, vid))
                unicast_packet->ttvn = unicast_packet->ttvn - 1;
 
-       ret = batadv_send_skb_to_orig(skb, orig_node, NULL);
+       res = batadv_send_skb_to_orig(skb, orig_node, NULL);
+       if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS)
+               ret = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
+
         /* skb was consumed */
        skb = NULL;
 

---
base-commit: 95b6f66b2659f617ce1937e790f48dc578ee014c
change-id: 20260729-ucast-send-restrict-return-f485c0eed54b

Best regards,
--  
Sven Eckelmann <[email protected]>

Reply via email to