On 10/22/2010 03:24 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com>
> ---
> This makes my N-PHY radio at least running (no scanning results so far). The
> same register is used by wl on this device.
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> index 78016ae..d2734c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/rfkill.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  /* Returns TRUE, if the radio is enabled in hardware. */
>  bool b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(struct b43_wldev *dev)
>  {
> -     if (dev->phy.rev >= 3 || dev->phy.type == B43_PHYTYPE_LP) {
> +     if (dev->dev->id.revision >= 3) {
>               if (!(b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI)
>                     & B43_MMIO_RADIO_HWENABLED_HI_MASK))
>                       return 1;

Over the weekend, I was able to test this patch using all my b43 hardware. There
were no problems.

Despite having no problems, I still NACK the patch for the reason that b43 only
applies to devices with id.revision >= 5, thus the revised "if" will always be
true. The patch should be rewritten as only b43legacy needs to test the 802.11
core revision.

Larry

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Reply via email to