> This hacks leads to incorrect SPROM parsing for me and reading for > example MAC as: 00:00:00:54:00:00. Michael G. who introduced this > confirmed it is not needed anymore. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> > --- > Michael: I guess I could add your Tested-by. Is that right?
That ist right. I suppose the correct entry would be Tested-by: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]> > John: it's 2.6.38 ofc. It should apply cleanly no matter if you applied > my previous patch for guessing unknown SPROM revision. There is not > dependence between that 2 patches. > --- > drivers/ssb/pci.c | 4 ---- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c > index b5343ac..f529663 100644 > --- a/drivers/ssb/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/ssb/pci.c > @@ -580,10 +580,6 @@ static int sprom_extract(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct > ssb_sprom *out, * Always extract r1. */ > out->revision = 1; > ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "SPROM treated as revision %d\n", > out->revision); - } else if (bus->chip_id == 0x4321) { > - /* the BCM4328 has a chipid == 0x4321 and a rev 4 SPROM */ > - out->revision = 4; > - ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "SPROM treated as revision %d\n", > out->revision); } > > switch (out->revision) { -- Michael Gerdau email: [email protected] GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
