On 05/11/2011 07:31 AM, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 07:17 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 05/11/2011 02:35 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
W dniu 11 maja 2011 02:12 użytkownik Larry Finger
<[email protected]> napisał:
On 05/10/2011 06:56 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
W dniu 11 maja 2011 01:42 użytkownik Larry Finger
<[email protected]> napisał:
On 05/10/2011 07:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Documented in:<[email protected]>
This reference is not correct.
Ouch, GMail seems to lie to me. Any change you can give me real message id
of:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00049.html
This one is good.
Sorry, do you mean<[email protected]> is OK? Or should I
use link I posted instead of message ID? Or do you know how to get
message ID from the link above?
Use the link
"http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00049.html";.
<[email protected]> just points to a non-existent email address on my
domain. I don't know how to get a message ID.
It's just an email header added by your MUA.
For example: Message-ID:<[email protected]>
The advantage of this is that links change and vanish. However, message
IDs don't. The message ID uniquely identifies a message, regardless of
where it's stored. So even if the mail archive moves to another URL,
it's still possible to find the actual mail by the ID.
Ahh. Yes, that Message ID is correct. I just rechecked the header in the mail
that I sent. Sorry for the confusion and noise.
Larry
_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
