On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:00:21 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> wrote:
> +#define B43_PPR_CCK_RATES_NUM 4
> +#define B43_PPR_OFDM_RATES_NUM 8
> +#define B43_PPR_MCS_RATES_NUM 8
> +
> +#define B43_PPR_RATES_NUM (B43_PPR_CCK_RATES_NUM + \
> + B43_PPR_OFDM_RATES_NUM * 2 + \
> + B43_PPR_MCS_RATES_NUM * 4)
> +
> +struct b43_ppr_rates {
> + u8 cck[B43_PPR_CCK_RATES_NUM];
> + u8 ofdm[B43_PPR_OFDM_RATES_NUM];
> + u8 ofdm_20_cdd[B43_PPR_OFDM_RATES_NUM];
> + u8 mcs_20[B43_PPR_MCS_RATES_NUM]; /* SISO */
> + u8 mcs_20_cdd[B43_PPR_MCS_RATES_NUM];
> + u8 mcs_20_stbc[B43_PPR_MCS_RATES_NUM];
> + u8 mcs_20_sdm[B43_PPR_MCS_RATES_NUM];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct b43_ppr {
> + /* All powers are in qdbm (Q5.2) */
> + union {
> + u8 __all_rates[B43_PPR_RATES_NUM];
> + struct b43_ppr_rates rates;
> + } __packed;
I don't think this union has to be packed.
And most likely struct b43_ppr_rates is ok without packing, too.
You could probably remove it there and add a BUILD_BUG which checks something
like (pseudocode):
BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct b43_ppr_rates.mcs_20_sdm) != B43_PPR_CCK_RATES_NUM
+ B43_PPR_OFDM_RATES_NUM * 2 + B43_PPR_MCS_RATES_NUM * 3);
Removing packed will produce much nicer code.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
