Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> writes: > I'll point out that the BIRD codebase is cleaner and better designed > than babeld, and might be able to scale better. I'd be interested in > seeing a comparison.
Yeah, me too. I know that the Bird daemon itself can easily handle full BGP tables, and I don't *think* there's any reason why the Babel protocol implementation should fall down on this (famous last words). It may kill the *network*, though, as it is going to be bursting out ~10k packets on every update interval (which is ~14 MiB of data)... -Toke _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
