On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> wrote: >>> I confess curiosity, now that we have quagga, bird, and mainline babeld >>> versions, and nifty new stuff like unicast hellos, as to how well they >>> interoperate at this point, as well as perform, under a stress test like: > >> And FRR... > > Babeld and FRR are known to interoperate, but that's little surprise, > since they're based on the same code. > > Quagga (the better-named ancestor of FRR) does not have a Babel > implementation. > > Perhaps Toke and David can tell us more about the tests they've done with > their respective implementations.
David's implementation also does unicast route transfer? > (It would definitely be a cool thing to organise an interop event, perhaps > here in Paris. Not before 2018, though, the way my schedule is going.) Regrettably I have no time either, before 2018, it seems. I do hope to have completed removing infinite buffering from a wifi mcast queue, replacing it with a drop head, fq'd version by then. fiddling with rtod sparked a great deal of (largely futile) thinking about deadline scheduling and sanely shedding (cpu or bandwidth) load, some of which I just wrote up here: https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/ER5Kcp5KGRj?cfem=1 > > -- Juliusz -- Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619 _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users