On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 03:22:19AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Dear Ondrej, > > I think that RFC6126bis answers all of your comments except this one:
Hi Thanks for all your answers. The first comment is clear. The second one, well, once one knows what to expect then one would understand section 3.8.1.2 in that way, but IMHO for uninformed person the RFC6126bis version of that section is even harder to understand properly than one form RFC6126. For the seqno request timeouts, IMHO it would be better to have some suggested values in Appending B like for other values. Total number of retransmissions is probably less important than retransmission timeout value. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
