ah, cool, all_worker_info looks like it'll help out. This doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere on http://backgroundrb.rubyforge.org/
Thanks! On 2/20/08, hemant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently, we only have all_worker_info and worker_info for queering > runtime information of workers. > I think, we can pimp up information provided by these methods. > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Ian Smith-Heisters > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cool, great to hear. Maybe my queue will have gotten through this job by > then ;) > > > > > > > > On 2/20/08, George Feil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Your timing is auspicious. I just coded up a status method for the cache > > > clearing worker I created for my company's CMS app. I received the > green > > > light from my manager to donate the code to the project; however, I > > > still have a bit testing and perfecting to do. Expect a check-in by the > > > end of the month. > > > Thats cool. Looking forward. > _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
