In my experience, I have found the 1.0.3 version more stable then the older one.. Admittedly I am not running lots of workloads through it, but it has been easier to setup and to code against...
Eric On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Morten Primdahl wrote: > > Hi, pardon if this is a duplicate mail, I forgot to click the > subscription link the first time around. > > I've been using backgroundrb for a while now (older version) and I've > had so many headaches because of it that I began looking for a > replacement technology. And then I saw the new and shiny backgroundrb > website, looking good! > > Initially I used the version maintained by skaar, but had some long > forgotten issues. On Ezras recommendation, I changed to the latest > version he did (a downgrade so to speak), and this has been okay, but > we see some connectivity issues with that once it's been running for a > while, eg. druby://10.1.65.87:22222 - #<Errno::ECONNREFUSED: > Connection refused - connect(2)> > > So, I'm here to ask, what's the state of backgroundrb 1.0.3? How much > has changed since Herman took over? Is it ready for production and > rock solid? Or should I go look for something else? > > Thanks, > > Morten > > > _______________________________________________ > Backgroundrb-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel ----------------------------------------------------- Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
