I understand that it's difficult to have a firm timeline, but it's also been a couple of weeks since the last thing we've heard on tagging a new version.
On Jun 18, 2008, at 1:31 PM, hemant wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Ian Lesperance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I am hesitant to jump onto the edge, since this is being used in aproduction application. Also, since I believe I've managed to eliminate our reason for needing to restart BackgrounDRb, it's more of an inconvenience atthis point.Do you have plans to tag a release anytime soon, be it through Subversion orGit?I am not committing a time line, but I intend to release new version this weekend if everything I planned goes well. Also, I hear from folks( and in my own experience), git version is a _lot_ more stable. If you don't want to change in production at least try in production. _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
