On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@do-not-panic.com> wrote: > Using expression is pretty flexible, in this case we > don't want that flexibility as it can override any > struct who also uses the same variable name. For a > specific example of the issue refer to the netdev-ops > demo git tree [0] which provide an example of the issue > with two SmPL rules. > > We keep the expression on the last rule on NETLINK_CB(skb) > given that we know only an skb can possibly be used on it. > > 1 3.0.101 [ OK ] > 2 3.1.10 [ OK ] > 3 3.2.68 [ OK ] > 4 3.3.8 [ OK ] > 5 3.4.107 [ OK ] > 6 3.5.7 [ OK ] > 7 3.6.11 [ OK ] > 8 3.7.10 [ OK ] > 9 3.8.13 [ OK ] > 10 3.9.11 [ OK ] > 11 3.10.75 [ OK ] > 12 3.11.10 [ OK ] > 13 3.12.40 [ OK ] > 14 3.13.11 [ OK ] > 15 3.14.39 [ OK ] > 16 3.15.10 [ OK ] > 17 3.16.7 [ OK ] > 18 3.17.8 [ OK ] > 19 3.18.12 [ OK ] > 20 3.19.5 [ OK ] > 21 4.0.0 [ OK ] > 22 4.1-rc8 [ OK ] > > [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/netdev-ops.git > > Cc: co...@systeme.lip6.fr > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@do-not-panic.com>
Applied and pushed. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
