At 15:20 +0100 11/8/06, phil wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:29:02 +0100, Gordon Joly wrote:
Site http://www.baa.com
Last reboot 441 days ago
Running Solaris 9/10 with Apache
So, security patched and up to date?
I don't think so....
Nah, your assumption is incorrect. Netcraft reports "last reboot" and
"uptime" using a mixture of TCP Timestamps and pings, which won't give
you accurate results in this scenario.
www.baa.com seems to be two hosts that are serving requests in a
round-robin configuration.
In that configuration you'd be able to patch and reboot one machine at
a time without a loss of public service and with the "uptime" that is
being reported by Netcraft unaffected.
-- phil.
Hello Phil,
Aha! I see what you mean. Here is another well know site as reported
by Netcraft:
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.bbc.co.uk
Gordo
--
"Think Feynman"/////////
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]///
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
