Hi welcome to the list Jim,
Can I suggest you lurk a little more before posting more.
It tends to be bad form to complain at such a early stage :)
Cheers,
Ian Forrester
Jim Gardner wrote:
I'm not exactly over-the-moon about the idea that everyone's private
email address is visible. What are people still using Windows
supposed to do if someone decides to attach a worm?
On 27 Feb 2007, at 18:13, John Drinkwater wrote:
On 27/02/07, Jim Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He privately mailed me and used words I won't repeat for fear they
trigger the spam filter.
Is he sub-normal or is that the crack on this list? If so I'm not
interested in continuing with it.
I got similar comments from someone else off-list related to comments
i've made here and on the BBC editors site.
The list certainly attracts people of various opinions, but he's
certainly sub-normal. :-)
On 27 Feb 2007, at 14:44, Dave Crossland wrote:
> "The list's House Rules are simple: Be Nice To Each Other and Don't
> Break The Law. If you are rude or spam the list then you'll be taken
> off."
> - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html
>
> Will this policy be acted upon?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dave
> -
--John '[Beta]' Drinkwater
http://johndrinkwater.name/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
