On 17/09/2007, Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I'm quite curious about the "as much as 40% of any
revenues"
> quote in the article: everywhere else has reported a
> consensus of 10%.)
> > In the light of the amount of "unlocking" or hacking
going
> on. Don't you think the rest were actually quite lucky
to
> have not got into this deal with Apple?
> Well, I would also consider how mainstream mobile
phone
> unlocking is today, and how much of a deterrent it is
to the
> mobile operators in seeking phone exclusives.
One of the interesting things (for me anyway) about the
iPhone is about
how it completely re-writes the rules of voicemail. So
much so that it
needs the phone operator to change their systems in
order to cope.
I guess you've never used a "3" phone then?
I'm afraid I'm very boring when it comes to phones. Mine is used for
texting and calls only and it's a battered little basic thing :)
Of course doesn't mean the iPhone and 3's network will play game either!
