> > > Not it isn't. > You failed to show either of the only 2 things needed: > 1) That the software is not Open Source. > 2) That the software is not DRM. > What was stated was that there is no open source digital rights > management. > Your points about completion, grammar, usability are irrelevant in > proving or disproving the given statement as they have nothing to do > with the statement.
Surely "is fit for purpose and actually works now" is a requirement. And all three fail dismally. Rich.
