well exactly, if you don't want to care about it, but equally you may only be interested in the World Service TOTP and so making sure we get the modelling and structure right (and then expose it nicely - which I guess is the main point here ;-) means you'll be able to slice and dice our programming whichever way you want,
Jamie. On 5/1/09 14:44, "Michael" <m...@cerenity.org> wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2009 11:26:25 Jamie Tetlow wrote: >> Getting down to the nitty-gritty of our internal data structure we'd >> probably say that the International World Service 'Top of the Pops' and the >> BBC One 'Top of the Pops' > > Which of course the audience simply do not, and should not have to, care > about, ever. > > > Michael. > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
