>From Roderick Hodgson in R&D who is now actively hacking this platform
(mostly in spare time, though we may have somethig for either Big Bang or
Maker Faire):

http://www.adafruit.com/blog/2010/11/14/hacked-kinect-is-now-a-3d-video-capture-tool/
http://digitizor.com/2010/11/15/hacked-kinect-brings-futuristic-user-interface/
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/11/kinect-running-on-multiple-platforms-looking-cool/


On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Jonathan Chetwynd <
j.chetw...@btinternet.com> wrote:

> ifixit teardown
>
> http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Microsoft-Kinect-Teardown/4066/1
>
> ~:"
>
>
> On 18 Nov 2010, at 15:22, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
>  ...all this bumpf about how fancy they are[0] is just a load bollocks.
>>
>> I am wondering if them Kinect things are really working a lot simpler; and
>> after waking up in the middle of a shower am now postulating that:
>>
>> 1.      They have a simple static laser interference pattern (e.g. akin to
>> [1] or those
>>        star projectors you can buy from street vendors).
>>
>> 2.      However this one is very very fine and nicely randomish. i.e. dots
>> less than a few
>>        mm appart.
>>
>> 3.      They use a crappy low resolution normal monochrome web cam; with a
>> black bit of glass so
>>        only IR gets let through.
>>
>> 4.      They simply pass the image of this camera back.
>>
>> The reason that this works is that every 'pixel' at CCD level for
>> distances of working range will have 1 to 100 or so 'tiny dots' on it -
>> depending on the distance it is at. Which is why we have roughly the range
>> we get; why we have such a near perfect 1/sigma callibration curve and why
>> the range of values you get it so odd - and why they filter certain types of
>> noise so badly.
>>
>> And perhaps, perhaps:
>>
>> 5.      They do a phase locked loop amplifier loop in software by flashing
>> the projector.
>>
>> But I doubt that given the noise/error artifacts.
>>
>> And that is really all there is to it. Anyone here with a good high-res
>> SRL which can do enough IR detection to check if indeed this is the case ? I
>> guess a fun test would be to use a mirror to project a few extra pixels onto
>> a flat area - and see if that area suddenly jumps 'forward'.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dw
>>
>>
>> 0:
>> http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2010/11/features/the-game-changerand 
>> all the mystification on how they work.
>> 1:
>> http://www.zimbio.com/Popular+Topics+in+Astronomy/articles/vnjstT2fTM2/Green+30mw+Laser+Pointer+Pen+Style+Star+Holographic
>> -
>> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
>> please visit
>> http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
>>  Unofficial list archive:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>>
>
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
>  Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>



-- 
Ant Miller

tel: 07709 265961
email: ant.mil...@gmail.com

Reply via email to