On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:25 PM, David Birnbaum wrote: > Craig, > > I realize a lot's gone into your thinking for 4.0 - I was wondering if it > would be possible to offer some sort of "cost" parameter to the host > configuration. Specifically, we have local hosts (backing up via a
Along similar lines, we backup a lot of VMware VMs as well as physical hosts. I expect my backup hardware could back up concurrent clients, but it would hammer the vmware storage if we did more than a couple of *those* concurrently. We can't be the only ones with this problem. In practice we just keep the concurrency down and we make it fit in our backup window, but that won't scale infinitely. Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer Internet2 office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ BackupPC-devel mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-devel Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
