Hi,
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 09:03 +0200, Winston Nolan wrote:
> good day to you,
>
> i have used backuppc in the past - awsome product! unfortunately i
> have had problems with space and had to revert to another product,
> symantec backup exec 10d
> this product has only given me nightmares! not even one smile!
> so i am back @ backuppc and i am loving it, i have one problem though,
> becuase of my space problems on my linux server i will have to store
> backup data on a nfs share on a windows box with raid 5.
>
> i have installed services for unix 3.5 on my windows machine, this box
> has got a 250gb storage on raid 5 and i would like my backuppc data to
> be stored on this drive. now, it installs fine after i have mounted
> the drive with nfs, but when i start backuppc it fails, now the reason
> for this is that it cannot create the socket
> my logs say this:
Are you 100% sure you want to do this? I think it's a recipe for
disaster on 2 counts. First I have played with SFU (which Microsoft has
stopped developping btw), mostly with the nfs client and it is horrible.
Slow transfers, timeouts and all sorts of trouble. Maybe the nfs server
is better, but don't count on it. I would only use that for emergencies.
Secondly: I think it's very dangerous to use nfs in this situation,
especially if more than one backup is running at the same time. NFS
semantics are close to unix semantics but not quite. For instance: it
can take up to 30 seconds before a newly created file is visible to all
clients. And there are several more gotcha's.
So to summarize: nfs in windows is not so good (maybe better with
cygwin) and I think nfs is the wrong tool for the job.
What I would do is export the windows partition you want to put backuppc
on with iSCSI and import it on your backuppc server. You don't need the
shared access of NFS, because backuppc will be the only client, and with
iSCSI you get blocklevel access to the partition (it's now a local
device to the backuppc server) so you can put any filesystem on it you
want. And iSCSI is much faster than NFS. Especially on a gigabit
interconnect. All the software you need on Windows is downloadable from
Microsoft and is available for every Linux distribution. You do need a
fairly recent 2.6 kernel.
> 2005-11-28 07:41:45 unix bind() failed: No such file or directory
>
> now, i have read in the mailing lists that this can be done, is there
> anyone on this list that has done it before, putting that data on a
> windows nfs share, using services for unix nfs server, or what server
> works best?
> they have in their release notes that it will accept unix domain
> sockets with internix, and i have that started but backuppc can
> clearly not create that socket.
>
> please guys this will be an awsoem setup and i want it to work so bad,
> so if anyone has some help they can offer me i will be very happy,
> also feel free to tell me where i will run into a wall using this
> setup, good things about it and the bad things
Forget about nfs and try iscsi, you'll be glad you did.
> thank you very much and have a great day!
>
> winston
Hth,
--
Guus Houtzager Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP fingerprint = 5E E6 96 35 F0 64 34 14 CC 03 2B 36 71 FB 4B 5D
Early to rise, early to bed, makes a man healthy, wealthy and dead.
--Rincewind, The Light Fantastic
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
