On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:37:14AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > I don't think it will be practical to let one backuppc system > back up another, although I've always wished it could for > a similar scenario where the 'sub' levels are in remote > offices. I think it could be made to work but would require > extra code in the server to not copy the pool, understand > that the files are already compressed, and use some efficient > method to only copy updated files on each run.
Hmm. it would require lots of ram due to the huge number of files/links, but otherwise, what's the problem with just using rsync to replicate one to the other? Don't worry about backuppc at all, just shut it down & let rsync do its thing. danno -- dan pritts - systems administrator - internet2 734/352-4953 office 734/834-7224 mobile ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
