Les Mikesell wrote: > Timothy J. Massey wrote: >> Again, I ask everyone: does anyone have a better solution? I have >> heard only two solutions to the off-site storage issue. 1) Do an >> archive to some sort of removable media. Given the storage >> requirements, I don't see how it could be anything *other* than a hard >> drive. If you were going to spend four figures to buy a big enough tape >> library, wouldn't you use it for backup directly? Or 2) create some >> sort of RAID-1 configuration and break it regularly to swap out a drive >> and store it off-site. Someone even recommended a 3-drive RAID-1, so >> the data stays redundant, but you can still break the array. It doesn't >> change the workload on the array, however... >> > > If you have a suitable offsite location with enough internet bandwidth, the > low-maintenance way is to throw a vpn between sites and let an independent > instance of backuppc run from there, backing up the same targets. You > might need to make the initial copy on the local LAN or perhaps add each > new target on a Friday and let it run through the weekend to get started. >
When I was using BackupPC, I used "file_sync" (part of BackupPCd) to do a byte-level mirror (rsync-like) everynight from the BackupPC machine to the offiste mirror. My BackupPC array was 1TB. -- Roy Keene (Contractor) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/