Craig Barratt wrote: > I do have a question: for your 2.x package you hardcoded the > config paths. In 3.x the FHS mode places the config files in > places similar to your 2.x package - but not exactly the same. > > That's why people that started with your 2.x debian package > and then upgraded using the vanilla tarball are having problems. > > What paths did you use for the 3.x package, and will it do the > right thing when a user upgrades from the debian 2.x to the > debian 3.x package?
With my last upload, the paths are the same used for the 2.x package, to make the Debian upgrade very easy. But I'm open to any suggestions: which paths do you think I should use ? Cheers, -- Ludovic Drolez. http://zaurus.palmopensource.com - The Zaurus Open Source Portal http://www.drolez.com - Personal site - Linux and PalmOS stuff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
