Michael Mansour wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have the following host summary:
>>
>> server1 username 1 20.6 3.36 0.77 2 10.4
>>
>> 10.4 idle done server2 username 1 20.6 3.23
>> 0.74 3 10.4
>> 10.4 idle done server3 username 2 20.6 8.52
>> 1.89 4 18.6
>> 18.6 idle done server4 username 2 20.6 3.01
>> 1.41 5 10.4
>> 10.4 idle done server5 username 2 20.6 3.38
>> 1.24 4 18.6
>> 18.6 idle done server6 username 2 20.6 2.86
>> 1.44 5 10.4
>> 10.4 idle done
>>
>> This is on a test BackupPC server still using Beta 3.0 (I'll soon
>> build a production BackupPC server to replace this box).
>>
>> I'm wondering why the full backups numbered 2 are not going back
>> down to 1 to free up some space on the server?
>>
>> In the glbal Schedule, I have the following:
>>
>> FullPeriod: 6.97
>> FullKeepCnt: 1
>> FullKeepCntMin: 1
>> FullAgeMax: 7
>>
>> and it's my understanding that backuppc should cycle those full
>> backups above to trash because of the above globals yes?
>
> Did anyone have any ideas on this?
>
Full backups that incrementals are based from are not deleted until
after the corresponding incremental runs have been removed, and your
last full will not be removed until the next one is complete.
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
