Hi,

I am doing some c$ share lock-down in Windows Group Policy at present 
and backup failures are expected for primary backup attempts and for 
catch-ups on any failures. No problem there. What _wasn't_ expected was 
that with the failed hosts that are getting retried at each wake-up all 
the other hosts (ie. currently up-to-date) are getting extra backups. 
This is clearly undesirable as it rolls out my older states 
unnecessarily and runs my DumpPostShareCmd notifiers causing spam.

Any suggestions for what bits of the BackupPC configuration I can set to 
prevent this whilst ensuring the normal backups keep working? Aside from 
lengthening the wake-up intervals, I would have thought that only failed 
hosts would get retried whilst also picking up any hosts ready for new 
backup but as as for previously successful hosts getting retried within 
their retention periods I am not so comfortable with.

- Do backups and retention check off each other? backup <-> retention 
... versus ... retention<-backup dismissing backup<-retention
- Can retention policies 'block' backup attempts?

My schedule for all hosts:

hourBegin 7
hourEnd 23
weekDays 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
hourBegin 7
hourEnd 21
weekDays 6, 7

Thanks

-- Mark

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to