Hi,
dan wrote on 18.10.2007 at 21:18:48 [Re: [BackupPC-users] wiki [no forums]]:
> you know, i just read those stats on wikipedia quality.
you like statistics, don't you?
> anonymous users have higher quality posts when post count is low. as post
> count increases, quality drops
>
> registered users have medium quality posts when post count is low but
> quality increases as post count increases!
Ok, then I'll continue posting anonymously for the time being (so I'll be
writing higher quality posts) and create a login at some suitable later
point (so that my post quality increases even further). Agreed?
Strangely, that is what I was going to do anyway, without being aware of
this fundamental scientific truth.
> with that in mind, i 'almost' feel that having it open like it is might
> encourage some quality posts by non-registered members.
I wasn't saying anything to the contrary. I was just pointing out that it
*is* in fact open. Maybe I was subconsciously trying to encourage some quality
posts by non-registered members?
> any other thoughts?
My brain is completely empty.
Regards,
Holger
P.S.: A solitary thought just popped up: the wiki regrettably does not
attribute pages to the author (or last editor). This would undoubtedly
further encourage some quality posts by registered members.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
