Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:20:46AM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
> wrote:
>> It is generally believed on this list (I believe) that it's not
>> feasible to use something as 'high-level' as rsync to replicate
>> BackupPC's pool. The amount of memory needed by rsync will just
>> explode because of all the hardlinks. Usually people have been
>> using low-level tools like dd or dump to copy a complete pool
>> filesystem to another one.
>
> Then this list believes wrongly; I've had no problems doing it at
> all, for some weeks now. It's the getting it encrypted part that's
> tricky.
>
> rsync has to think for a while, but it works, and I've never noticed
> any memory problems on that machine. The machine does have 2GiB of
> RAM, however.
It will work up to some limit on filenames and hardlinks that backuppc
archives are likely to exceed. There are 2 issues - there is a fixed
memory overhead per filename that is handled in a single run and the
mechanism to match up the linked files doesn't scale well.
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
