On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 06:46:14AM -0500, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: > On 04/02 12:17 , Tino Schwarze wrote: > > These are all unix domain sockets and should simply be ignored (whycan't > > tar save these like the device nodes in /dev?) > > Because sockets are created on the fly; and should only exist when their > parent process exists. Creating them without a corresponding process to be > attached to them is meaningless; and therefore they should never be backed > up.
So shouldn't BackupPC always skip them and never store them in the backups? Bye, Tino. -- „Es gibt keinen Weg zum Frieden. Der Frieden ist der Weg.” (Mahatma Gandhi) www.craniosacralzentrum.de www.forteego.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
