Arch Willingham wrote: > I have been looking at (and installed) both packages. I have tried > to find a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each as > compared to the other but found nothing very informative. Any ideas- > thoughts from anyone out there?
- BackupPC is more geared towards backing up to hard drives, Bacula is more geared towards backing up to tape. - Bacula uses a Bacula agent on each host you backup, BackupPC uses stock rsync(d)/tar/smbclient on the hosts you backup. - BackupPC has a nice web interface that makes it very easy to restore files. Nils Breunese. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
