full or incremental really discribes how they are stored on backuppc.  a
full will hang around longer than an incremental.  As far as the actual
transfer, the only real difference is that a 'full' doesnt skipp files that
have the same mtime where an incremental skips those files.  This causes a
full to hit the CPU on both sides more but it doesnt use very much more
bandwidth as the only added data transfer is the checksum of those files.

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Rob Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Christian Völker wrote:
> > |> Assume, the full backup is finished after two weeks- will the next
> full
> > |> backup take the same amount of time?
> > | If you are using rsync it will be much faster next time, sending only
> > | the changes.
> > If so, again the question what is then the difference between a full
> > rsync backup and an incremental one? I think I'll have to read the docs
> > again to understand this...tried already several times, didn't succesed
> ;-)
> >
> With rsync, the difference between a full and incremental has more to do
> with processor and disk activity than with bandwidth.  Both use about
> the same bandwidth.  If you ask me, it doesn't make sense to call them
> "full" and "incremental", but I guess those terms are holdovers from the
> days when BackupPC didn't offer rsync as a transport.
>
> -Rob
> ********************************************************
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of this transmission
> in
> error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this e-mail.
> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as
> information could be intercepted, corrupted lost, destroyed, arrive late or
> incomplete, or contain viruses.
> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
> in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail
> transmission. If verification is required please request a hard copy
> version.
>
> ********************************************************
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to