With the amount of data I reported and number of files I just have 6% of inodes
occupied so I don't think that is really a problem, do you use XFS for any
special purpose besides dynamic inode creation? What do you think about
recovery and maintenance tools for XFS. And least but not lest don't you have a
bigger processor overhead with XFS?
Usually people tend to say processor is not important while backing up but from
what I've seen if you have like 8 or more hosts backing up data the processor
and memory are stressed up. if you have to manage a FS with a large processor
demand can't this be a bottleneck?
Cheers,
Pedro M. S. Oliveira
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 19:30:33 Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 03/18 05:48 , Pedro M. S. Oliveira wrote:
> > What FS do you guys use recommend/used and why?
>
> I typically use XFS for backuppc data pools, and ext3 for the root
> filesystem. I don't want to run out of inodes like ext3 can do. :)
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro M. S. Oliveira
IT Consultant
Email: pmsolive...@gmail.com
URL: http://pedro.linux-geex.com
Cellular: +351 96 5867227
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
