Holger writes:

> I believe Craig is researching other alternatives (a fuse FS to handle
> compression and deduplication, so BackupPC could, in fact, use native rsync).
> If that proves unviable, upgrading File::RsyncP to protocol version 30 would
> probably be next. But File::RsyncP is open source, so you're free to optimize
> it yourself :-). If I find any time at all, I'll take a closer look at the
> matter, but that's pretty much an "if (0)" ...

I have built a prototype (and standalone) fuse implmentation that
does deduplication, compression and supports extended attributes.

I am starting to test it with native rsync.  My initial results show
is that it is quite slow.  Basic rsync system calls often take many
file system operations.  I need to figure out how much faster it can
be made.  I also am mindful of the issue of incomplete fuse support.

Failing that, I agree my next step is to upgrade File::RsyncP.

Craig

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to