By the way, sorry for the tone of my previous mail. I realized afterwords that I came across as condescending. I think, I get a bit too obsessed with an idea or mindset sometimes.
Thanks for bearing with my noob questions and attitude. And I do need to study BackupPC more before making ignorant assumptions :-( For my immediate problem, I'm probably going to switch back to rdiff-backup, but give it the --no-hard-links option, to reduce memory usage. I totally missed that before. And I seriously don't need to preserve /usr/bin/ etc hardlinks, or I can generate a list of files to hardlink together (after restoration) separately. Longer term, probably switching over to BackupPC is better. I'll probably start by migrating some of the backups in the near future. Still not too sure about the DBX mail files, have to consider that further. Maybe it's not as big an issue as I think it's going to be, especially if I'm not keeping every single daily version of DBX files for the past X years. David. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
