> > Just because a word processor has tables doesn't mean you shouldn't be > > using a spreadsheet. > > huh? your statement is not even logically parallel let only > comprehensible. Do you just like to argue for arguments sake or only > to avoid admitting you were wrong?
Then I'll explain: you can argue about the need to make the table function of a word processor more functional, or you can just use a spreadsheet. The best solution isn't always extending the functionality of a product. > Do you know anything about zlib compression and perl parsing of > text-based files? I do, in fact. Is this relevant in some way? > I am convinced you just like to argue. I'm convinced you cannot refrain from personal attacks > I am still waiting for you to contribute something new and positive to > the group beyond just arguing to get in the last word. You're really making a strong case for when you can't back up what you're saying, you just engage in petty personal attacks. It's quite tiresome. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
