Gerald Brandt schrieb: > > > > > I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a > > pool with > 10 TB. > > > > > > > * I have recently taken my DRBD mirror off-line and copied the BackupPC > > > directory structure to both XFS-without-DRBD and an EXT4 file system for > > > testing. Performance of the XFS file system was not much different > > > with, or without DRBD (a fat fiber link helps there). The first > > > traversal of the pool on the EXT4 partition is about 66% through the > > > pool traversal after about 96 hours. > > > > nice ;) > > You may want to look at this thread > http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17234.html >
I've seen this thread, but the pool sizes there are max. in the lower TB region. Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
