Les Mikesell wrote: > > Pool matching is done based on the file content, not the name. Backuppc > won't know what you mean by 'corrupted', but if the content is > different, it becomes a different pool entry, not linked to existing > ones with different content.
Yeah I was just worried that if you end up with some FAT/HDD issues on your backup drive, and it corrups one file in the pool, it will corrupt it for every single full or incremental backup that you have, requiring the next backup to fix it. So the only difference between incremental and full is the method of veryfing if the data has changed? On the backup drive they end up identical anyways (except a full is like a filled incremental) ? +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by [email protected] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [email protected]. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
