Right, didn't get the diskless part, never try that. Ok, thanks
That's good to know, so you do have a good LAN. hehehe

What can be wrong?
One is crappy raid. Did, or can you, test it with only one disk? I
understood raid is automatic when you put a second disk, but I was reading
fast.
Don't believe on a NIC matter, and configuration you must have check it a
lot.
Try speeds with CIFS/SMB or rsync?
Just my 5 cents over my head... :) but less than 1MB/s is really slow,
right?

And maybe with should leave it for another post/subject. This is probably
more than David was hoping for :)

I'm starting to think NAS are pretty much black boxes, so I'll go for more
if possible (bigger if not) new disks to the server. eSata or USB3 external
disks may also be nice possibilities, but those connections are not
available on our tough old backuppc servers :)

Still, NAS gives others advantages.

Regards
Luis

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Adam Goryachev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Luis Paulo wrote:
> >
> > "of=/tmp/test specifies the output file (of=) as /tmp/test ..."
> >
> > Right, but that's why I was expecting it targeting the mount point of
> > the pc directories.
> > The equivalent of of=/mnt/nas/media/test in the second command.
> > Sorry to insist.
>
> Yep, sure, but as I said, that machine is a diskless machine, so / is
> actually NFS mounted from the old NFS server :) hence /tmp is already on
> the NFS server. The new NFS (netgear nas) is mounted under /mnt/nas/media.
>
> > That apart, I'd love to hear about those other issues, and figure out
> > why is it at 834 kB/s :)
>
> Yep, me too :)
>
> > We established that with a 100M LAN, we can't expect more than 10MB/s.
> > That's important for home users. All NIC's and switch/router have to be
> > 1G to expect more. (I think all, not only some NIC's, not sure)
>
> AFAIK, you only need to upgrade the connections to the PC's that
> want/need the faster speeds, plus the NAS device itself (and switch).
>
> > Allow me a few questions, if you have the time:
> > On the netgear, are you using its build raid1? Hot swap works?
>
> Yes, using built-in RAID1
> Not entirely sure... I've removed/plugged a drive while it was switched
> on, and it seemed to work, but I haven't tested removing a drive, and
> plugging in a blank one. I want to get the more basic stuff working
> first (like decent performance over NFS).
>
> > Do you use the torrent capability (probably off subject)
>
> No, I've disabled all the extras... I just need a NFS server, no extras...
>
> > Thanks. You didn't expect to be so nagged when trying to help, right?
>
> No problem :)
>
> I'm thinking that I should have sprung for the bigger netgear nas, or
> else the QNAP one, (QNAP sounded really good, and has a great feature
> list... possibly worth it though considering the amount of time I've
> wasted so far on the netgear :(
>
> I'm not suggesting the netgear is crap BTW, just it doesn't work for me
> yet...
>
> Regards,
> Adam
>
> - --
> Adam Goryachev
> Website Managers
> www.websitemanagers.com.au
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAku77AgACgkQGyoxogrTyiU5RgCffC3JIPYZJ2U/MGjgwwZ+swQ+
> Bj4AoJP/6XsEN5oxC62Y9cChwntg2K8p
> =UBoS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to