I discontinued backup of my old web server this weekend and upgraded rsync
on the new web server to 3.0.5 to be compatible with the backuppc server.
This morning, backup traffic was close to 450MB. I did one full backup
(existing files 1492/14MB, new files 12/0MB) and three incrementals
(existing files 3826/411MB, new files 778/27MB).
The traffic pattern suggests that one of the incremental backups (existing
files 3734/411MB, new files 664/21MB) accounted for the bulk of the
traffic. I had migrated multiple MediaWiki instances over the weekend,
all using an identical code base. One MediaWiki instance had been backed
up last week. Although the file counts and aggregate data is
considerable, I would have expected rsync to detect that the files had
already been stored in the backuppc server and would not have transferred
the files. The data volumes would suggest otherwise.
Am I missing something obvious?
Thanks, Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
