On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:31:29AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > Honestly, I never really looked into whether it enforces the > constraints you mention above. But looking at the code, it seems > that these constraints are enforced only by the BackupPC main > routine (i.e. daeomon) itself (which then after checking such > constraints uses the same server messaging system to actually call > the BackupPC_nightly routine). Therefore my standalone routine > would NOT enforce such constraints.
*Fantastic*. Thank you! That's exactly what I wanted. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/